Dating and Courtship (as we knew it is mostly dead)- No
Strings Attached. (Part III)
For lots of reasons (including part I and II in my current series) it seems as if the idea of dating exclusively, and waiting to get to know someone prior to being intimate is a thing of the past. Other reasons the author goes into is that our generation had a lot of divorced parents to deal with. However, she did talk with both children of happily married parents who have the same attitude. Clearly something other than a bad childhood is at work here.
More Quotes from the Book and Feedback:
“Hooking up as a way to break this ice. You don’t want to waste a month of your life getting to know someone only to find out you are not sexually compatible. “
The previous stereotype was that the men would be pushing
the women to get physical and the women would be resistant until they were sure
the relationship had potential. In the new world, the women are the ones
deciding to have sex on the first meeting and to immediately decide if there is
sexual compatibility.
“I don’t see the point of waiting at all. It is not a ‘deal breaker’ in a relationship because you had sex too fast.”
You would think that at least the impression that your partner holds you in some sort of special or exclusive category would hold some sort of meaning. I find it difficult to believe that someone who would have sex with someone very quickly would not have done the same with pretty much anyone.
“I want someone a little promiscuous. I don’t want to end up with forty years of missionary sex.”
I am blaming the Internet for this one. The proliferation of Porn to everyone leads to a raised sexual bar. In addition, the once taboo subject of sex is pretty much on every show on TV at this point. Whole women’s’ magazines are devoted to the subject of sex. Titles on the covers usually say “What HE really wants in Bed” or something to that effect.
“recycled” “a term many people of my generation use to describe to having sex with an “ex.”
I call this breakup sex but the recycled term is probably
better. (It implied that it happens multiple times vs. only once after a
breakup.)Clearly in this case it is “no strings attached” since the strings
were previously severed by the breakup.
“Marriage Lite. Is the holy grail for this generation: intimacy without risk, commitment without traps.”
Shows like Sex in the City and other popular entertainment also promote the idea of marriage not being taken seriously. “Less Strings Attached.” I suppose cohabitation (without a real commitment in place) is usually what they refer to as Marriage Lite. I am drawing a distinction though between soon to be married couples (engaged) cohabitating vs. merely a roommate situation. Let’s not kid ourselves about what is going on in the bedroom, ok. This is a “no strings attached” situation when you can leave whenever you want without a commitment.
We all either know people or have done or thought all of the above ourselves. So you know that our generation definitely has a “No Strings Attached” attitude. So there is no question that when you have everything minus the commitment, there is very little incentive to get (or have) it. I believe the saying from my parents generation would be something about “Free Milk and a Cow.”
Yet why not? Reward without the Risk. You would think that this would be paradise right? Well, not so fast my friend. The people she interviewed in this book told a different story. Although both men and women said that they enjoyed being able to have careless, meaningless sex with attractive people (pretty much at will) they found that they longed for something more.
(Quote from a male interviewee from the book.)
“A recent promotion at work made him view commitment in a different light:” “I desperately wanted to call someone—and I realized that there was no one to call. That is when I realized why I do want a long term relationship”
It appears the “no strings attached” has a flaw. None of the “flings” or “sex-buddies” were people this guy felt he could share something important in his life with. I have had the same feeling myself. After graduating from college and working at my first job I had worked very hard to complete my first professional certification. Since I had broken up with my girlfriend though and lived in a strange city I had no one special I could celebrate my accomplishment with.
Conclusion:
All the “seven deadly mistakes” mentioned in this book (I only picked 3) sound good in theory. Only worry about yourself and be selfish. Sounds great right? It’s all about me. Don’t put any effort into any relationships. Why bother? Why shouldn’t I only spend my time and money on myself? Why commit? I have lots of attractive women/men willing to share my bed, right?
Well, the easy answer is that doing these things don’t make us happy. At least not over the long term. We are social creatures but we are wired in a way physically and emotionally to want to have that special bond with someone. At the same time we have a lot of these expectations, social conditioning, sexual politics, etc that all work against us being able to open up and have the relationships that we long for. The good news that that recognizing this can help us to ignore such things and allow ourselves to drop the expectations, media portrayals, and sexual politics brainwashing that is preventing us from being happy.
I have already recommended this book to my girlfriend (who is reading it now) and also many male and female friends. The book is not the “silver bullet” to all your romantic woes, but I did find it did make me take a more introspective look at myself and the world I have observed while dating as an adult. Hopefully it will help put the romantic challenges we have in perspective, and maybe even help us get closer to success.
Recent Comments